Reimer says the ZTA is reasonable and has forced a 30 foot setback on the ZTA based on no logic whatsoever (Please send documentation if he has ever presented a logical reason). We do NOT NEED towers with a 60 foot setback because Wireless companies have clarified that their towers can travel over 2,000 feet.
Cell phone companies have confirmed that 5G “small” cell towers do not need to be placed every hundred feet (despite industry statements that densely placed small cells are needed in close vicinity to homes).
Verizon’s CEO, Lowell McAdam stated on camera that 4G and 5G antennas will work from 3,000 feet away on Macro Towers. This statement proves that Verizon DOES NOT need to place 5G small cells in residential areas every 500 to 1,000 feet.
Watch it here.
“When [Verizon] went out in these 11 [5G test] markets, we tested for well over a year, so we could see every part of foliage and every storm that went through. We have now busted the myth that [5G frequencies] have to be line-of-sight — they do not. We busted the myth that foliage will shut [5G] down . . . that does not happen. And the 200 feet from a home? We are now designing the network for over 2,000 feet from transmitter to receiver, which has a huge impact on our capital need going forward. Those myths have disappeared.”
-Lowell McAdam, CEO of Verizon
“[Verizon 5G] is really high frequency [28,000 MHz and 39,000 MHz], so everybody thinks it doesn’t go very far, but it’s a really big pipe and so that’s what allows you to gain the super fast speeds . . We’re 3,000 feet away from our radio node. the cool thing about this is that we did not move the radio node. . . here even 3,000 feet away, we’re still getting 1,000 [Megabits per second] speeds . . . So now we’ve driven about 1/3 of a mile away [1,760 feet] from the radio node. we are still getting very good speeds even though we have foliage in between [800 Megabits per second].”
-Jason L., Verizon Field Engineer
The image below is from the European Union Project that looked at radiation absorption from a far field antenna onto the bodies of a man, woman and child.
The yellow is the highest absorption rate and the blue is the lowest. Child absorb this radiation at a higher rate over more of their body.
Why is anyone placing this involuntary radiation exposure onto our children!
Children play in front yards!
The image below is from the European Union Project that looked at radiation absorption from a far field antenna onto the bodies of a man, woman and child.
The yellow is the highest absorption rate and the blue is the lowest. Child absorb this radiation at a higher rate over more of their body.
Why is anyone placing this involuntary radiation exposure onto our children!
Children play in front yards!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.